Ask
(R)uffda!
It’s
a brand new season and we all know what that means. Time to reach into the old
mailbag and answer a question or two, questions you may not even know you asked,
let alone wanted answered.
Dear (R)uffda!,
I always look forward to finding
out what the NCAA rule changes are for the upcoming season. I also like to sort
paper clips and watch ice cubes melt. So what’s new for 2014?
Need a life, desperately
Dear Need a Life, Desperately,
I’m
going to make an assumption here and guess that you’re more interested in major
changes than you are in the usual reffing minutiae. Or do you want to know that
it is no longer required that a libero’s shorts be identical to her teammates’?
Or that the team mascot on the uniform sleeve is OK, as long as it does not
exceed 3”x5” or 4”x4”?
Let’s
see. Timeouts have been changed from 60 seconds to 75 seconds. Apparently, the
coaches made it clear that they needed 15 more seconds if they were going to be
including a joke. However, the coaches, by mutual consent, can shorten this to
60 seconds or extend it to 90 seconds -- for a specific match.
Other
than that, the only one you might actually notice is that contact with the net
outside the antennae is now legal, provided the player does not interfere with
the other team or use the net for support while playing the ball.
(R)uffda!
Dear (R)uffda!
What? That’s it?! I waited nine
months for THAT?
Need a life, desperately
Dear Need a Life, Desperately,
Wow.
That was quick. It’s almost as if you wrote me back before I even answered you.
Weird.
Yes,
that is it. But, because you obviously seem disappointed, there are also some
points of emphasis for the refs this year you might find intriguing. This, for
instance, are their Ball Handling Directive Guidelines*:
Goals of the Ball
Handling Directive
Consistency in ball handling
judgment
ü
Only
the contact point should be considered when judging legality. Just because a
player is wearing mittens does not automatically mean she cannot set cleanly.
ü
Outside
influences such as player technique, spin, coaches’ expectations or crowd
reaction should not be considered when judging the legality of the contact.
However, the guy in the premium seats with the gopher ears? He knows what’s
what. Listen to him.
ü
There
is no body/ball position or playing technique that automatically results in
illegal contact. If the setter insists on setting with her feet? Well, call
THAT. That’s just ridiculous. NO ONE can set that way. And, on second thought,
call the mitten-setter, too.
An increase in continuation of
play when judging second ball contacts that are directed to a teammate
ü
A
player in good position must play the ball without discernible double contact.
In short, even Lauren Carlini can double her set. Maybe.
ü
Less
severe judgment is applied to a contact by a player who makes a challenging or
spectacular play. Seriously. This sounds like a joke, but it isn’t. But try to
keep the unicycles off the court.
ü
Mishandled
balls resulting in a blatant fault should still be called, regardless of the
challenging or spectacular nature of the play. In other words, good luck with
all of this. We realize these guidelines are impossible to follow.
(R)uffda!
Should
be a great season. Be sure to write!